In This Together: A Poem and Poll

pope-francis-2-300

 

Heaven is for all:

atheists, agnostic, yes,

even religious.

 

You don’t believe me?

Ask the Pope. We all do good

in a true god’s eyes.

 

 

 

NaPoWriMo Day 5 – Should I?

DISCLAIMER: This is an OLD poem that I finished out of boredom the other day. I’ve been away from the computer, so this is the first time I’ve been able to post anything. I hate rhyming poems, so I’m not a fan of this one, but the first section came out smooth a couple months ago and I’ve been picking at it since. Don’t plan on doing anything with it.

 

Should I spend my life,

my hours,

my time,

Guessing intentions

closed off from

my mind?

Are you feeling?

Emotion?

Logic?

At the very least, are you kind?

 

They tell me that I should

Believe,

have Faith.

In the way that they see you.

You’re real

with no trace.

Except for some books and

some miracles.

Passed down;

word-of-mouth is so great.

 

Distortable, changeable

with no one

to argue.

And should you deny it,

watch out;

they will find you.

They scream they are right,

“Your view is

denial.”

It is only to them you should run to.

 

But these truths are perspectives,

human-based

to the core.

They parade their view as if

they know

what’s in store.

Should I trust my eternity

set snug

in their hands?

In their opinion, their textbooks and lore?

 

To them I’d be putting

my fate up

to you.

But forsaking my own heart? Then

where do I

turn to?

You made this heart my own

to guide me

to you,

so all of this bullshit I’ll trudge through.

 

I’ll make my own path

as others

have done,

know you not in the way of

the Father,

the Son.

I’ll know you in Spirit,

in passion

and love.

I’ll accept you and deal with the shuns.

Schrodinger’s God

Okay, this needs to be a bit quick, because I’m really tired and need a full night of sleep for once.

I had a revelation today, debating once again about religion on Yahoo. I got into a discussion on truth, on the fact of versus the belief in god, and who in the religion business is right versus who is wrong. In my struggle to get this other person to understand that no one knows 100% the image of god, the will of god, or the parameters god may or may not have set in the world for us to follow, I developed an interesting analogy which I am quite happy with. And here it is:

God is Schrodinger’s cat.

egypt-cat-prev12666453581bbJjM

And now we know where the Egyptians got it from.

The idea is that no one can claim that they know for an absolute fact where the line is drawn between right and wrong in any given situation. Don’t get me wrong here, there are things that are simply ‘sick and wrong’ in the world that no person should be okay with. There is a right and wrong, and I’m sure there is a line, and we try to define that line through laws, social norms, and religious guidance. Despite these human-defined lines, however, we still have different cultures which draw the line in different places, and we still have people who cross over that line despite the consequences. Why is this? I beg to say that it is because that individual’s personally-drawn line is different from the society-developed line. Every person has their own personal line, and it is up to that individual to decide, if their line goes past the boundaries of societal lines, whether they will stay true to their personal line or the societal line.

The person I was talking to seemed to hold the line between good and evil on the same plane as god itself, so lets go into the whole concept. Just as we cannot determine where the true line between good and evil is (it looks more like a fuzzy grey blur in the middle somewhere), we also cannot define with perfect clarity the image or intentions of god. We cannot agree as a human race what god looks like, what god’s intentions are for our existence or our way of life, and, as described above, where god drew the real line between good and evil. We can guess away with what we believe to be evidence of god’s existence, god’s intentions, etc. but they are only educated guesses.

Looking at god this way, we could say that god is in a box. We are pretty sure it’s in there, but we do not for certain, and if we guess that it is, we cannot be certain in what state it is in. We cannot observe its appearance or its reasoning for being in the box. We can find clues around the box, but we cannot peak inside. According to Schrodinger, because the attributes of the cat cannot be absolutely defined from outside the box, than any observation regarding the cat inside is both right and wrong at the same time. The cat is both alive and dead. So if I say the cat is dead, I am right, but someone who says the cat is dead would be just as right as I would be. This is the same with our interpretation of god. All religions are simply people giving their interpretation of the god in the box, and they are all both equally right and equally wrong.

So…what do you think?

Impossibility: A List

Haven’t had much inspiration this weekend, along with some car problems that were more than distracting. So today, browsing my followed blogs, I came upon a very fun little Daily Prompt: Impossibility. Here is the prompt:

alice_in_wonderland_ver5_xlg

“Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” – the White Queen, Alice in Wonderland.

What are the six impossible things you believe in? (If you can only manage one or two, that’s also okay.)

I was quite the ambitious little bunny and managed to think of all six. I’ll give a very brief explanation to each, just because I can and I want to keep typing.

  1. The wounds of life leave no scars.  It is not for us to expect the scars of life to disappear, it is only for us to ignore them until you forget where they were in the first place.
  2. To see ‘equality’ used in the proper context.  The conflict on the topic of equality is one which I still don’t understand. I strive to explain to people that giving others equality is not the same as agreeing with them. They can still be equal to you and have differing views. For once, I’d like to talk with someone who agrees.
  3. Political correctness does not make you right.  I live for the day when political correctness is a cursed phrase.
  4. My novel will be a movie someday.  I think Peter Jackson is the only person besides myself who I’d ever give the rights to direct/produce the movie adaptation of my novel, simply because I am writing the novel as an adaptation of the movie in my head. I do enjoy writing screenplays though, so maybe…
  5. Quality over quantity.  The media is proving just how much more people want quantity and don’t give a damn about quality. Someday that will change. Someday.
  6. An orange white mocha.  I have tried so many times to make this drink a reality. There will come a time that science brings us a substance that keeps milk from curdling when mixed with citrus, and when that times comes, I’ll be there with my mug ready. 🙂

Latte01

Tomorrow I’ll actually have something creative, I swear! XD Until then!

True Religion vs. False Religion: An answer through my perspective

First, a disclaimer: Just because I write about some old, cultist religion like Gnosticism, does not mean I’m planning on following it as a religion. My interest in other religions, dead or otherwise, is simply a personal interest in finding god in all religions, and so far I have not come up with a religion that does not have god somewhere in it. So for the record, unless the beginning of my train of thought does not start with something like, “I believe…” then whatever I’m talking about in terms of religion is simply speculation and “What if…” thinking. Questions? Okay, to the main event.

A good friend from college sent me a question, inspired by my prior religion posts. He asked, “Is there a distinguishing mark(s) between true and false religion, if any, from your perspective?” So, here you go!

Blunt answer: None.

Extended Answer: To begin, I’m using the definition of religion as a group of people who share the same core beliefs, and likely in turn faith, in their creator. Keep in mind, it does not need to be a society-approved, institutionalized religion. I could stop here and say that, according to the definition, so long as a group of people bring themselves together through a common belief in a creator, it is technically a true religion, and that the only way for a religion to be false is if the group calls itself a religion but does not center their beliefs around a creator. But that isn’t the answer my friend is looking for, so I’m going to give a legitimate answer.

Now, let’s go back for a moment to how I see god; a being of neutrality and omnipotence, which created all aspects of our lives and created all in love. Love is the balance of mind and spirit, establishing a feeling far beyond what humans consider ‘love.’ God’s love incorporates trust at its core, trust in us to live our lives as we like on this earth. its love does not incorporate jealousy, which would bring it out of its nature in neutrality and cause a hostility within it. In the same way it does not love us as we comprehend love, choosing one of us over another of us. This also includes its love for all its creations, and so we are no better or worse than any other animal on this planet, any plant, any star in the sky, any other creature in any other plane of existence god may have created in its time. We as humans simply have given ourselves the extra task of trying to comprehend god in this life, instead of having the patience to come to understand it in a time when it shows itself fully to us. Whether that is a ‘good thing’ or not, I will not get into.

If we look at our lives in the way I described the loving parent and the college child in A long, long post on what I base my life on, we see a god which does not opening interfere with our lives, but simply lets us use the knowledge it has given us to make our own way through life. It is not in harshness or cruelty that god does this, but in trust that we are its creation and can manage. It is the same with all creatures. Again, we simply have a harder time of it because we are given a different level of knowledge. Because of this, and because of our distorted (although not bad or wrong) idea of love, we search for reasoning behind god leaving us to our own devices in this world. Instead of living our lives and enjoying our gifts to the fullest, we distract ourselves with trying to be with god in the life, when that is not the point of this life. This distraction is religion.

Before I continue, I know I need another disclaimer. First off, this is all my opinion. I could be wrong. Everything I’m saying could be bullshit. But it’s what I believe, and I’m sticking to it. Second, I am not saying that religion is bad. I’m not saying that we are bad people, or stupid people, for establishing and relying on church in our lives. It may come off that I think people are weak because they follow a church. Although I cannot really honestly say that that’s not what I’m getting at, I don’t want people to take that as a negative. Religion brings people to a partial understanding of god. There’s nothing wrong with that. I believe that god put us here so that we could enjoy its other gifts to us without worrying about god, that this life is a time to experience, and it has nothing to do with this minute amount of time we have. If we seriously want god to interfere, I don’t think it will ignore us, but for the most part it will leave us be. The constant ‘calls’ if you will, from religious people are not ignored, but left until god is sure we have exhausted our own possibilities without it first. This is why there are so many in Christian faith who find ‘God’ at their lowest point in life.

Okay, I’m going to reel myself back a little. That was getting into a tangent. My point is, religion is created to find god in our lives today, in a way that is palatable for the group of people interested in finding god at the time the religion is created. We look around at all the aspects of our world and try to piece together what god is. We use visuals to create an image of god we do not know, to feel more comfortable about god in regards to our senses. We give god a name, so it seems more solid. We give it a gender so that it can hold a strong and acceptable place in our society. We sometimes make many gods, because some cannot comprehend that one entity could create or govern all the cosmos, or because there are so many commanding entities in the world, how could we choose just one to represent god itself? We give god emotions, so we can anticipate how god will react to us and how we live; so we can feel comfort in knowing we are doing the ‘right thing’ in its eyes and our enemies are not; so we can justify our own actions; and so we can position god within our society as a leader figure. We call god above us, but make it one of us at the same time.

Let me restate that there is nothing wrong with all this. It is human nature to want to be close to its creator, is a blessing and curse upon us all. Some people embrace the blessing and some despise the curse. But when we look at the core of religion, this is all it is; a call out to know god. God, as the loving being it is, knows that we will come to know it in later life, after our experiences here are over. Because of this, god allows us to interpret it in our own way, and that is where the many religions, institutionalized or not, come from. We interpret the little aspects of god that we hold closest in our lives and inflate them into something that many people can relate to. Some people live their whole lives for religion, and sometimes they dedicate their lives to the wrong aspects of those religions. You can suggest examples of your own, if you like. I will give none, as I do not want to seem like I am targeting any one religion over another.

In all this, we see that, as social beings, we need structure, and society-approved values, to feel accepted and secure. Religion gives people that. It gives them a miniature society in which to believe without fear, because they are in numbers. It takes courage and strength to believe in the whole religion, especially when there is turmoil within, or aspects you do not completely agree with. But to me, all religions, true or false, are real religions, and have a piece of god in them somewhere. Since it is our nature to want to know it, we find that piece of god no matter how long it takes. Sometimes we do not realize that is the piece we were looking for, and sometimes we never realize it. But we do find it, and carry it with us for the rest of our days. And that piece may be different for you than it is for another person. Remember, god created everything, and so god is in everything, and so in every piece of every religion. It just depends on which piece best fits you and your life.

I don’t really have anything else to say about this except that people will likely have to say, “But Rana! Some religions are evil! They make you do evil things! How can those religions have god?!” Well, because god does not mean ‘good.’ God means neutral. If god were good, than evil must have existed as a separate thing from god, and so god would not have been the beginning and omnipotent. And if nothing existed before god, than there is no such thing as the absence of god, and so again, no evil. Good and evil are pure perspective, and both creations of god which it leaves us here to experience, along with everything else. This isn’t a ticket to go do evil things, as I’ve said before. Along with this, there’s the typical answer we hear all the time; didn’t the Catholic Church commit the Crusades? There are many religions which existed to give sacrifice, human and otherwise, for their gods. Even Judaism had the tradition of killing livestock and doves for god in their time. Are these not considered bad things to do? But the religions themselves are not considered evil. It is all perspective. There are people who think what I’m writing right now is blasphemous and evil, but I don’t think so. And there are those who would agree with me. Just because one person says something is evil doesn’t mean everyone on the planet is going to agree. Even Hitler thought he was in the right during World War II, and he convinced others to believe the same. Any religion can be good or evil depending on the perspective of the person. So no, there is no such thing as a good religion or an evil religion. It is simply the religion that the person feels most comfortable in. The aspect of good and evil have nothing to do with it.